<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" xmlns:itunes="http://www.itunes.com/dtds/podcast-1.0.dtd" version="2.0">

<channel><title>Franteractive Strategy Portal - New Content</title>
<description>RSS Feed for new content on FranTerActive’s Business Strategy Portal</description>
<link>http://rss.franteractive.com/feed3.xml</link>

<language>en-us</language><copyright>Copyright (c) 2007 – 2010 Franteractive Inc. All Rights Reserved</copyright>
<webMaster>info@franteractive.com (Sam Mishra)</webMaster>
<pubDate>Fri, 19 Feb 2010 20:55:00 EST</pubDate>
<atom:link href="http://rss.franteractive.com/feed3.xml" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>

<item>
    <title>Technology Invasion</title>
    <link>http://www.franteractive.net/tech-invasion.html</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<p>The tech strategy model below depicts a disruptive technology which begins its <b>trajectory of technology invasion</b> at point D. We have placed two baseline frameworks,
with which you all must be familiar, if you have used this Open Strategy Portal before: S-Curves and the Ansoff Matrix. In particular, we have placed
points A, C, and D from the model with the corresponding points on the familiar S-Curves framework:  

<br><br>
<center><IMG  src="http://www.franteractive.net/resources/franteractive-techstrategy-technology-invasion.jpg"></center>
<br><br>
When the invasive technology has a gap in terms of performance output from the technology and what is demanded by the existing market (at time T1),
the businesses selling the existing technology see no threat from the invasion. But what if the invasive technology is able to become a successful
business by courting lead users and creating a new niche market, and make it to point B, where it is able to meet the existing market demand
(at time T2)? Typically, it starts taking market share from the older stagnating / mature technology because of its better price / performance
metrics... To learn more about this technology strategy model, associated concepts like <i>lead users</i>, and its applications to current
technologies / products (iPad, <b>Google Buzz</b>), listen to the associated podcast...
]]></description>
      

      
<pubDate>Fri, 19 Feb 2010 20:55:00 EST</pubDate>
<enclosure url="http://www.franteractive.net/strategic-case-analysis/franteractive-technology-strategy-technology-invasion.mp3" length="13816593" type="audio/mpeg"/>
<guid isPermaLink="false">podcast2010techstrategytechinvasion</guid>
    
      <itunes:duration>28:46</itunes:duration>
</item>

<item>
    <title>Dominant Designs and Technology Cycles</title>
    <link>http://www.franteractive.net/DDTC.html</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<p>If you have listened to our podcast on S-Curves, you are already familiar with terms like Technology <i>ferment, take-off,</i> and <i>mature / stagnate</i>. However,
before a technology is productized / servitized and takes off in the market-place, there is fierce competition, and eventually a <i>dominant design</i> emerges, as depicted
in the following technology cycle</i>.

<br><br>
<center><IMG  src="http://www.franteractive.net/resources/FranTerActive-TechStrategy-Technology-Cycles.jpg"></center>
<br><br>
 So, what is a "dominant design?" What might intrigue you, and what the holy grail of product marketing truly is, is this concept called "<b>Dominant Design.</b>" Why can
 your business model be shaky, if you package a product / service around a technology which does not have "dominant design" writtern all over it?
 Are there exceptions to this rule? Read more by clicking on the link above, where you you will find
 a link to the associated podcast. Alternately, click on the link to the mp3 file below to download the podcast directly. Enjoy, it is only 32 minutes
 long!
]]></description>
      

      
<pubDate>Fri, 12 Feb 2010 20:55:00 EST</pubDate>
<enclosure url="http://www.franteractive.net/strategic-case-analysis/franteractive-technology-strategy-dominant-designs.mp3" length="15432014" type="audio/mpeg"/>
<guid isPermaLink="false">podcast2010techstrategydomdesign</guid>
    
      <itunes:duration>32:08</itunes:duration>
</item>

<item>
      
<title>Should Building Platforms Be Your Next Technology Strategy?</title>

<description>A platform strategy, as opposed to old-fashioned product strategy in terms of products and services,
requires an external ecosystem to generate complementary innovations. As a result, "iterative feedbacks" between the
complements and the platform help the technology / product underneath the platform increase its potential for growth and
innovation at a rate unmatched by single firms trying to innovate alone! Click on the link above to learn more...</description>
<link>http://www.franteractive.net/platforms-tech-strategy.html</link>
<pubDate>Mon, 08 Feb 2010 23:55:00 EST</pubDate>
<guid isPermaLink="false">FranteractiveTechStrategyPlatforms</guid>
</item>

<item>
      <title>Socratic Dialogue - Candy Case (Swiss Chocolate) Solved on Halloween</title>
      <link>http://www.franteractive.net/strategic-case-analysis/strategic-case-analysis-solved-case-3-socratic-dialogue.mp3</link>
      <description><![CDATA[
      <p>In this podcast, Sam Mishra, the author of <b><i>Strategic Case Analysis: Business Concepts, Strategy Frameworks, and Solved Cases as Socratic Dialogues,</b></i> takes the role of the Interviewer, and  Jay Mishra assumes the role of the interviewee (could be an undergrad student in an Ivy League or an MBA student), as he goes about solving this NEW MARKET ENTRY case…The case is touched upon to a sufficient extent in the Franteractive Strategy Portal FranTerActive.Net, and is fully solved in the aforementioned book (and in this podcast).</p><p>The dialogue is built using frameworks like the 4P’s and the 5 C’s, and uses microeconomics concepts like the horizontal demand curve, demand elasticity, price sensitivity, profit maximization during perfect competition (Marginal Revenue = Marginal Cost), extraction of available consumer surplus, through price discrimination, etc. Branding and advertising strategies are also discussed.<p><p>If you are interviewing for a job in this tough economy, you should read <b>Strategic Case Analysis by Sam Mishra</b>. If you are not sure about marketing as a career track for MBAs (including brand management, strategic marketing, product marketing), you should read Strategic Case Analysis: Business Concepts, Strategy Frameworks, and Solved Business Cases as Socratic Dialogues. The book’s ISBN number is 978-0-9798354-0-7, and it is currently priced at $15.99 on Amazon.com. If you buy two copies, Amazon.com waives shipping and handling fees. </p>   ]]></description>
      <pubDate>Sat, 31 Oct 2009 10:45:00 EST</pubDate>
      <enclosure url="http://www.franteractive.net/strategic-case-analysis/strategic-case-analysis-solved-case-3-socratic-dialogue.mp3" length="13613936" type="audio/mpeg"/>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">Socratic_Solved_Case_3_Dialogue</guid>
      <itunes:author>Sam Mishra</itunes:author>
      <itunes:explicit>no</itunes:explicit>
      <itunes:duration>28:21</itunes:duration>
</item>

<item>
      <title>Cash in Gas - Podcast as a Socratic Dialogue</title>
      <link>http://www.franteractive.net/strategic-case-analysis/strategic-case-analysis-solved-case-4-socratic-dialogue.mp3</link>
      <description><![CDATA[
      <p>In this podcast, Sam Mishra, the author of <b><i>Strategic Case Analysis: Business Concepts, Strategy Frameworks, and Solved Cases as Socratic Dialogues,</b></i> takes the role of the CEO (or Interviewer), and Payat assumes the role of the Consultant, as he goes about solving this tough problem-mix the CEO faces: increasing sales but declining profits in some gas stations in spite of galloping gas prices (the case is set in 2006 / 2007, when gas prices were going through the roof); and declining gasoline revenue but increased profits in other stores! The case is touched upon to a sufficient extent in the Franteractive Strategy Portal FranTerActive.Net, and is fully solved in the aforementioned book (and in this podcast).</p><p>In the podcast, the author announces his second book: <b>The 20 Trillion Dollar Value Drain: How Goldman and Other Banks Looted America and Why They Will Do It Again</b>, which is an outgrowth of his published articles and weekly podcasts on FRANCONOMICS.COM. We also break this important news:<b>STRATEGIC CASE ANALYSIS (ISBN-13: 978-0-9798-354-0-7) is now a prescribed text-book in UNLV - University of Nevada, Las Vegas,</b> a large accredited University in the United States. The book, nonetheless, can also be a great refresher business book for practicing business owners and start-up CEOs. In addition to theoretical frameworks like the Porter’s Five Forces, the Five C’s, etc., the book also contains practical frameworks like the Pareto Negotiation Frontier, Relational Contracts, NPV (Net Present Value) & CAPM (Capital Assets Pricing Model), and the VALS-2 Segmentation in the Advanced Frameworks Section. Most of these frameworks have immediate application not only in business, but also in handling your day-to-day human relationships, so buy the book today from Amazon.com.</p><p>Listen to this <i>Socratic Dialogue</i> to understand how the high-flying consultant effortlessly solves this tough case while giving all the credit to the CEO (as it should be, if you want that job in a CASE INTERVIEW setting) and thunders towards the end of this Socratic Dialogue: YOU HAVE JUST LAID THE STRATEGY TO INCREASE REVENUE, INCREASE GROSS PROFITS, INCREASE PROFITABILITY, DECREASE COSTS, AND KEEP THE TOTAL HEAD-COUNT UNCHANGED. I DON'T THINK THERE IS A BETTER CORPORATE STRATEGY, EVEN BY THE BOOK!</p>   ]]></description>
      <pubDate>Sat, 19 Sep 2009 11:35:00 EST</pubDate>
      <enclosure url="http://www.franteractive.net/strategic-case-analysis/strategic-case-analysis-solved-case-4-socratic-dialogue.mp3" length="11725344" type="audio/mpeg"/>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">Socratic_Solved_Case_4_Dialogue</guid>
      <itunes:author>Sam Mishra</itunes:author>
      <itunes:explicit>no</itunes:explicit>
      <itunes:duration>24:25</itunes:duration>
</item>



<item>
      <title>MP3 Podcast - Greener California Case on High-speed Railroading between LA and SFO Solved as a Socratic Dialogue</title>
      <link>http://www.franteractive.net/strategic-case-analysis/strategic-case-analysis-solved-case-1-socratic-dialogue.mp3</link>
      <description><![CDATA[
      <p>In this podcast, Sam Mishra, the author of <b><i>Strategic Case Analysis: Business Concepts, Strategy Frameworks, and Solved Cases as Socratic Dialogues,</b></i> takes the role of the Consultant (or Student), and Jay assumes the role of the Client (or Teacher), as they go about solving the <i>Greener California</i> business case. The case is touched upon to a sufficient extent in the Franteractive Strategy Portal FranTerActive.Net, and is fully solved in the aforementioned book.</p><p>In the podcast, the author also announces that <b>STRATEGIC CASE ANALYSIS (ISBN-13: 978-0-9798-354-0-7) is now a prescribed text-book in UNLV - University of Nevada, Las Vegas,</b> a large accredited University in the United States. The book, nonetheless, can also be a great refresher business book for practicing business owners.  In addition to theoretical frameworks like the Porter’s Five Forces, the Five C’s, etc., the book also contains practical frameworks like the Pareto Negotiation Frontier, Relational Contracts, NPV, and the VALS-2 Segmentation in the Advanced Frameworks Section. These later frameworks have immediate application not only in business, but also in handling your day-to-day human relationships! </p><p>Listen to this <i>Socratic Dialogue</i> to appreciate the fact that business cases typically don't have a right or a wrong answer. Also, this is a case on profitability, and in the course of the dialogue, the particiants touch upon a lot of standard business concepts: the Pareto 80-20 rule, the Second Mover's Advantage, Sunk Costs, etc.</p>   ]]></description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 10 Sep 2009 11:35:00 EST</pubDate>
      <enclosure url="http://www.franteractive.net/strategic-case-analysis/strategic-case-analysis-solved-case-1-socratic-dialogue.mp3" length="7682427" type="audio/mpeg"/>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">Socratic_Solved_Case_1_Dialogue</guid>
      <itunes:author>Sam Mishra</itunes:author>
      <itunes:explicit>no</itunes:explicit>
      <itunes:duration>16:00</itunes:duration>
</item>
 <item>
      <title>Franteractive Strategy Portal Case - Canning Coke Cans -Solved as a Socratic Dialogue(MP3 Podcast)</title>
      <link>http://www.franteractive.net/strategic-case-analysis/strategic-case-analysis-solved-case-6-socratic-dialogue.mp3</link>
      <description><![CDATA[
      <p>In this podcast, Sam Mishra, the author of <b><i>Strategic Case Analysis: Business Concepts, Strategy Frameworks, and Solved Cases as Socratic Dialogues,</b></i> takes the role of the Consultant, and Jay assumes the role of the Client (Coca-Cola), as they go about solving the <i>Canning Coke Cans</i> business case. The case is touched upon to a sufficient extent in the Franteractive Strategy Portal FranTerActive.Net, and is fully solved in the aforementioned book.</p><p>In the podcast, the author also announces that the book is now a prescribed text-book in UNLV - University of Nevada, Las Vegas, a large accredited University in United States.</p><p>Listen to this <i>Socratic Dialogue</i> to appreciate the fact that solving ANY business problem requires giving the needed attention to the pertinent details…</p>   ]]></description>
      <pubDate>Fri, 4 Sep 2009 11:35:00 EST</pubDate>
      <enclosure url="http://www.franteractive.net/strategic-case-analysis/strategic-case-analysis-solved-case-6-socratic-dialogue.mp3" length="8406750" type="audio/mpeg"/>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">Socratic_Solved_Case_6_Dialogue</guid>
      <itunes:author>Sam Mishra</itunes:author>
      <itunes:explicit>no</itunes:explicit>
      <itunes:duration>17:30</itunes:duration>
</item>

<item>
      <title>Audiophile Speaker Mfg Business - Socratic Dialogue as MP3 Podcast</title>
      <link>http://www.franteractive.net/strategic-case-analysis/strategic-case-analysis-solved-case-11-socratic-dialogue.mp3</link>
      <description><![CDATA[<p>In this podcast, Sam Mishra, the author of <b><i>Strategic Case Analysis: Business Concepts, Strategy Frameworks, and Solved Cases as Socratic Dialogues,</b></i> takes the role of the Consultant, and Jay assumes the role of the Client, representing the Audiophile Speaker Manufacturing business. The client has a business problem: its sale is seasonal, peaking prior to Thanksgiving / Christmas retail sales. Its customers, who are brand names ranging from Cerwin Vega to Niles Audio to Acoustic Research, have to place their products in retail chains like Best Buy and Circuit City by Mid-November. Frequently, to meet these deadlines, the client is forced to air-ship from India to USA.</p><p>This seemingly simple business problem has a lot of complexities underneath it, ranging from supply chain bottlenecks in China to sales forecasting in USA. The consultant finds out about these problems by engaging the client in a <i>Socratic Dialogue</i>. Once the consultant unearths the major problems, it proposes the solutions as part of this <i>dialogue.</i></p><p>In the podcast, the author also announces that the book is now a prescribed text-book in UNLV - University of Nevada, Las Vegas, a large accredited University in United States.</p><p>Listen to this <i>Socratic Dialogue</i> to appreciate solving a business case at its analytical best. In the process, you will also learn about CRM (Customer Relationship Management) / sales forecasting, supply chain automation / lean manufacturing, shipping container loads by sea vis-à-vis air-shipping, the Pareto 80-20 rule (as opposed to the Pareto Negotiation Frontier), etc.</p>   ]]></description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 2 Sep 2009 11:35:00 EST</pubDate>
      <enclosure url="http://www.franteractive.net/strategic-case-analysis/strategic-case-analysis-solved-case-11-socratic-dialogue.mp3" length="9726457" type="audio/mpeg"/>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">Socratic_Solved_Case_11_Dialogue</guid>
      <itunes:author>Sam Mishra</itunes:author>
      <itunes:explicit>no</itunes:explicit>
      <itunes:duration>20:15</itunes:duration>
</item>

<item>
<title>Strategic Case Analysis by Sam Mishra becomes a Recommended TEXT BOOK in UNLV</title>

<description>Strategic Case Analysis by Sam Mishra, Published by Franteractive Inc., is now a recommended TEXT BOOK for an undegraduate course in management at UNLV - University of Nevada, Las Vegas. The book, which is also an excellent primer on Business Strategy 101 for recent MBAs looking for jobs as also for mid-level marketing / business managers, is currently on sale for $15.99 on Amazon.com. Learn more about the features and benefits of the book here.</description>
<link>http://www.franteractive.net/Case-Analysis-Mastery-Manual.html</link>
<pubDate>Wed, 26 Aug 2009 10:35:00 EST</pubDate>
<guid isPermaLink="false">StrategicUNLV</guid>
</item>
<item>
      <title>Pareto NEGOTIATION Frontier - MP3 PODCAST</title>
      <link>http://www.franteractive.net/strategic-case-analysis/strategic-case-analysis-socratic-sam-mishra-pareto-frontier.mp3</link>
      <description><![CDATA[<p>In this podcast, Sam Mishra, the author of <b><i>Strategic Case Analysis</b></i> explains the Pareto "Negotiation" Frontier framework as outlined on page 141 within <b><i>Chapter 5 - Advanced Frameworks</i></b> of <b><i>Strategic Case Analysis.</b></i> As Mishra explains in this podcast, if two parties are negotiating, and one party knows the existence of the frontier, and the other does not, the party which knows that this frontier exists will be able to create and claim more value, without hurting the value claimed by the other party. During this discourse on negotiation, the author gets into business concepts like <i>integrative</i> and <i>distributive</i> bargaining, which are covered on page 26 within <b><i>Chapter 3 - Business Concepts</i></b> of <b><i>Strategic Case Analysis.</b></i> The book is available for purchase on Amazon.com, and the framework is available on the website FranTerActive.Net. 
      ]]></description>
      <pubDate>Tue, 4 Aug 2009 15:02:08 EST</pubDate>
      <enclosure url="http://www.franteractive.net/strategic-case-analysis/strategic-case-analysis-socratic-sam-mishra-pareto-frontier.mp3.mp3" length="4834279" type="audio/mpeg"/>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">Advanced_Frameworks_Pareto</guid>
      <itunes:author>Sam Mishra</itunes:author>
      <itunes:explicit>no</itunes:explicit>
      <itunes:duration>10:04</itunes:duration>
    </item>
<item>
      <title>MP3 PODCAST on TALC - Technology Adoption Life Cycle </title>
      <link>http://www.franteractive.net/strategic-case-analysis/TALC_Strategy_Mishra.mp3</link>
      <description><![CDATA[<p>In this podcast, Sam Mishra, the author of <b><i>Strategic Case Analysis</b></i> explains the TALC – Technology Adoption Life Cycle framework from his book. The author begins by explaining the differences between the five user groups of a technology based product, also known as the (1) Innovators, (2) Early Adopters, (3) Early Majority, (4) Late Majority, and (5) Laggards. The author then proceed to explain associated concepts like the following:</p><p>1.	<b>The Chasm</b>: Apparently, a chasm exists between the various user groups, but the chasm that needs to be really crossed for the technology based product to win in the market place is the one that exists between the early adopters and the early majority. There are a lot of reasons why a tech  product can’t go past this chasm. For example, if a product is tied to the economy, and the economy sours (as is happening right now at the time of broadcasting this podcast, i.e., mid-2009), then the product can very well fall into the chasm. Another example is the scenario where a bigger competitor with more resources comes and kills your product before you have been able to sell it to any Early Majority users. </p><p>2.	What strategies one should use while selling a technology based product to the early majority (clearly, the early majority will pursue the product / technology if it can given them a <i><b>competitive advantage</i></b>) vis-à-vis the late majority (this group can be sold the idea that since everyone else is using it, they should use it too; otherwise they will have a <i><b>competitive disadvantage</i></b>).</p><p>3.   Explains how the different stages of the <b>PLC</b> (product life cycle) and the <b>S-Curves</b> frameworks map into the five user groups or the five segments of TALC. For example, mathematically speaking, the S-Curve is the INTEGRAL of the TALC bell-curve, or if you plotted the area under the normal bell distribution, you would get the S-Curve!</p>]]></description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 15 Jul 2009 20:02:08 EST</pubDate>
      <enclosure url="http://www.franteractive.net/strategic-case-analysis/TALC_Strategy_Mishra.mp3" length="3355443" type="audio/mpeg"/>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">Advanced_Frameworks_TALC2</guid>
      <itunes:author>Sam Mishra</itunes:author>
      <itunes:explicit>no</itunes:explicit>
      <itunes:duration>18:13</itunes:duration>
    </item>

<item>
<title>Maximin Strategy from FRANTERACTIVE.NET</title>

<description>In which situations does it make sense to forego profit maximization and maximize your minimum gains instead (i.e., follow a Maximin Strategy? Find out by brushing up on Game Theory from FranTerActive.net, the business strategy portal for one and all.</description>
<link>http://www.franteractive.net/maximin.html</link>
<pubDate>Fri, 3 Jul 2009 19:58:00 EST</pubDate>
<guid isPermaLink="false">FranteractiveStrategyMaximin</guid>
</item>
<item>
<title>FRANTERACTIVE.NET - NDA - New Buzzword</title>

<description>Unless you are a business like the HP Printer Division which touts (as per a fairly recent keynote by its division head Vyomesh Joshi) that its arrangements with Japanese manufacturers don't even have a formal written contract, you are better off, for multiple reasons, to get that NDA or Non-Disclosure Agreement signed by various stakeholders. NDAs are necessary evils, but important business tools nevertheless. Learn more about NDAs and why you need them in the Web 2.0 world. </description>
<link>http://www.franteractive.net/nda.html</link>
<pubDate>Wed, 1 Jul 2009 18:58:00 EST</pubDate>
<guid isPermaLink="false">FranteractiveStrategyNDA</guid>
</item>
<item>
<title>FRANTERACTIVE.NET STRATEGY PORTAL - Sections on GAME THEORY Added </title>

<description>Game Theory was a part of Advanced Strategy Frameworks in the strategy portal until now. It has now been expanded and new web pages dealing with PRISONERS’ DILEMMA and DOMINANT STRATEGY have been added with 2 by 2 pay-off matrices to illustrate the concept of strategic gaming. Prisoner’s Dilemma  is the best traditional example in game theory to explain NASH EQUILIBRIUM, which, in the context of the Prisoners’ Dilemma, can be defined as: Prisoner X is doing the best it can given what prisoner Y is doing. Similarly, prisoner Y is doing the best it can given what prisoner X is doing. The link here will take you directly to the web page. Enjoy… 
</description>
<link>http://www.franteractive.net/prisoners-dilemma.html</link>
<pubDate>Mon, 29 Jun 2009 17:58:00 EST</pubDate>
<guid isPermaLink="false">FranteractiveStrategyGameTheory</guid>
</item>





<item><title>Silicon Valley Update: The demise of Silicon Graphics an Example of Marketing Myopia? </title>
<description>From the recently added business concept titled Marketing Myopia: This happens frequently in Silicon Valley, where the core of the product line for a company is its underlying technologies. Since technologies change very fast, unless there is focus on R&amp;D / product development, your existing products can become obsolete in due course. An example of this is Silicon Graphics, once a high-flying Silicon Valley firm. Once upon a time, the firm's products, namely high-resolution graphics workstations, were at the core of such famous Hollywood productions like Jurassic Park and Terminator 2. However, the company suffered from Marketing Myopia, did not upgrade its servers, giving other server firms a chance to steal market share / customers.  Silicon Graphics, which once boasted of multi-billion dollar revenue, has filed for bankruptcy, and at the time of writing (April 2009) is rumored to be taken over by a small server manufacturer for only 25 million dollars! To understand what Marketing Myopia is, click on the link above…</description><link>http://franteractive.net/marketing-myopia.html</link>
<pubDate>Fri, 3 Apr 2009 23:15:00 EST</pubDate>
<guid isPermaLink="false">franteractivestrategymarketingmyopia</guid>
</item>

<item><title>PODCAST – Sam Mishra narrates how he used the S-CURVES framework to trounce Scott McNealy of Sun Microsystems</title><description>In this PODCAST, Sam Mishra, Author of Strategic Case Analysis, talks about S-Curves and how he had successfully applied the framework to depict the disruption of Solaris by Linux. After his LinuxWorld keynote, Scott McNealy, the then CEO of Sun, was presiding over a Q&amp;A session. There, Sam got a chance to approach the whiteboard and draw the framework out in its applied form - - - i.e., the lower S-Curve depicting Solaris and the upper S-Curve depicting Linux (so Linux was depicted as lower in terms of technology adoption but disrupting Solaris nevertheless). Click on the link above to listen to the complete story and how you can apply S-Curves to chalk product strategy, business strategy, and corporate strategy…</description><link>http://www.franteractive.net/strategic-case-analysis/franteractive-strategic-case-analysis-sam-mishra-S-curves-2.mp3</link><pubDate>Wed, 18 Mar 2009 14:50:00 PST</pubDate></item>

<item><title>PODCAST ELABORATING “VALUE CHAIN ANALYSIS”  ADDED TO THE PORTAL</title><description>In this podcast, Sam Mishra talks about Value Chain Analysis and associated strategy concepts like forward integration, backward integration, off-shoring, outsourcing etc. Sam leverages his substantial experience in the software industry and explains a complex concept like Value Chain (which is typically used to analyze manufacturing companies) and how it can be applied to services companies like software. In the process, Sam touches upon the following: (1) What is forward integration, what is backward integration, how can you take strategic make-vs-buy decisions in the context of  off-shoring / outsourcing, etc. (2) When does it make sense to forward integrate (for example, if you are competing with IBM, which has a global services arm, you better acquire a services firm if you don't want all your accounts be taken over by Big Blue), and is the services firm too big to forward integrate / acquire? (3) Concepts like "synthesizing product requirements" as opposed to requirements "analysis" in the context of software development / manufacturing. (4) Why Porter's Value Chain Analysis remains a robust tool to analyze not only a company's core competency, but also complementary assets like off-shored contract software development, off-shored contract software parters doubling up as biz-dev partners who can "open doors", etc. CLICK ON THE LINK ABOVE TO LISTEN TO THE PODCAST…</description><link>http://www.franteractive.net/strategic-case-analysis/franteractive-strategic-case-analysis-sam-mishra-value-chain.mp3</link><pubDate>Sun, 15 Mar 2009 09:04:00 EST</pubDate></item>

<item><title>PODCAST ELABORATING THE FIVE C's FRAMEWORK Added</title><description>In this podcast, Sam Mishra elaborates on the Five C's framework from his book Strategic Case Analysis. Over and above what is covered under each C in the book, the author uses his industry experience, his dialogs with successful CEOs (Andrew Grove of Intel), and his analysis of competitive dynamics in the hyper-competitive Silicon Valley (competition between Cisco Systems and Juniper Networks to dominate the Core Internet Router business) to drive home the point that Five C's are a key tool-set for any business strategist / strategic marketer - - - (1) Company: The author narrates how he asked Andrew Grove (the then CEO of Intel Corporation) once what Mr. Grove's leadership style was, and what Mr. Grove's reply was. Listen to the podcast to find out more, and to understand why leaders can make or break a company. (2) Customers: While explaining the C relating to Customers, the author refers to segmenting customers in more meaningful ways, as dealt with in a separate podcast on STP &amp; VALS-2. (3) Competition: Delves more deeply into concepts like "tight appropriability", "complementary assets", and "speed".  The author also explains how Cisco Systems moved in strategically to dilute the competitiveness of Juniper Networks in the battle between these two companies for dominance in the  "core Internet routers" business. (4) Costs: In the context of outsourcing / off-shoring to reduce costs, the author uses his experience with a small product company which unsuccessfully tried an off-shoring model and failed. However, off-shoring software development to India can be a great cost cutting strategy if the firm is a larger firm, i.e., at least a thousand programmers. (5) Channels: The author explains, using the double marginalization concept, how it is important to know who has how much market power in which segment of the channel. To listen, click on the link above…</description><link>http://www.franteractive.net/strategic-case-analysis/franteractive-strategic-case-analysis-socratic-sam-mishra-five-Cs.mp3</link><pubDate>Mon, 2 Mar 2009 02:15:00 EST</pubDate>
</item>

<item><title>Podcast explaining VALS-2 Segmentation plus STP Marketing Added</title><description>PODCAST: Sam Mishra elaborates on the marketing segmentation related frameworks from his book Strategic Case Analysis. Using his vast experience in diverse industry verticals and actual marketing / strategy engagements, Sam touches upon the following in this podcast: (1) How Steve Jobs, the creator / founder / CEO of Apple Computers could fit into different psychographic segments pertaining to "Status" at different stages of his life, as he climbed from a "Striver" to an "Achiever" to an "Actualizer"; (2) Relationship between VALS-2 pchychographic segments and Maslow's Hierarchy of needs; (3) Difference between hot-sheets, beat-sheets, cheat-sheets in Positioning (part of STP - Segmenting, Targeting, Positioning); (4) STP best practices for segmenting industrial customer bases - can you do better than segmenting your customers into SMB (small and mid-size businesses), mid-market &amp; enterprise / Fortune 500? To listen, click on the link above…</description><link>http://www.franteractive.net/strategic-case-analysis/franteractive-strategic-case-analysis-socratic-VALS2-STP2.mp3</link><pubDate>Wed, 25 Feb 2009 21:20:00 EST</pubDate></item>

</channel></rss>